THIS JOURNAL IS ON 301 FAVORITE JOURNAL LISTSHonor: 0 [ Give / Take ]
1 entry this month
06:39 Apr 03 2016
Times Read: 664
The whole passive aggressive comments has never
worked for me
Speaking indirectly about a 'person' rather than directly to the said individual concerned, is well dumb.
It's been a year, a FREGGIN' year
(well tomorrow technically is 1 year)
A year of ZERO communication
Today... I get this lovely orange dot on skype:
" This message has been removed. "
If you found the nerve to write something,
for god sakes why delete it.
Meh.
Guess I will never know.
*shrugs*
RECENT JOURNAL POSTS
High Sire (159)
Needler (12)
Changeling (71)
ALL JOURNALS
REAL VAMPIRES LOVE VAMPIRE RAVE
Vampire Rave is a member of
Page generated in 0.1257 seconds.
COMMENTS
-
DragonReborn
07:17 Apr 03 2016
that is because they are cowards to begin with ..who hide behind a computer.that isn't even enough for some cowards..they write crap and than talk themselves out of sending it..or they do like this coward and delete it..they are not worth wasting time on
birra
16:32 Apr 03 2016
People struggle knowing themselves.
It because a trial for those of us who do, having to always deal with people who keep themselves in the dark, and lie to themselves.
They tend to lack the capacity to communicate in such a direct way.
Of course there's all types of passive-aggressive behavior. That's just one. The "indirect" public message serves a different purpose; usually to try and get someone else to engage so a person can communicate what is on their mind, knowing the person the message is about simply won't care.
But I agree. Just be direct. If you thought it was important enough to write it, say it. Own it. Why self-censor?