.
VR
Xzavier's Journal



THIS JOURNAL IS ON 144 FAVORITE JOURNAL LISTS

Honor: 0    [ Give / Take ]

PROFILE




8 entries this month
 

19:02 Aug 30 2009
Times Read: 784


In a world of perpetual disappointment we all deserve a break from time to time. So, here's yours for the day.



How to open clamshell packaging



Dealing with "clamshell" or "oyster" packaging (the rigid, sealed plastic that lots of electronics come in) can be a real nightmare. In fact, the term "wrap rage" was coined to describe the anger and frustration that inevitably arises when trying to pry the ubiquitous packaging open.



Thousands of people end up in emergency rooms each year with lacerations and puncture wounds from battling with the nearly impossible-to-open packaging. Many more get minor wounds from using sharp objects to open packages, according to American Medical News.



It's not the best choice for the planet either. Clamshell packaging is typically made from polyvinyl chloride (PVC), which is considered the most environmentally damaging plastic around. Its production releases toxic chemicals that make their way into our food supply and it's difficult to recycle.



Companies use the universally despised packaging because it secures items during shipping and helps prevent shoplifting. It's also easy to display in stores and allows consumers to see what they are buying.



Some businesses are finally getting the message that consumers have had enough. Amazon launched its Frustration-Free Packaging initiative to help reduce packing waste and wrap rage. An added bonus is that is saves consumers time as this video demonstrates. Sony, Microsoft, and Best Buy are also making efforts to phase out the aggravating packaging.



In the meantime, there's a surprisingly simple tool that can tackle clamshell packaging quickly, efficiently, and without injury -- a rotary can opener. The best part is you probably already have one sitting in a kitchen drawer. The video below shows how it's done.









Source: http://green.yahoo.com/blog/the_conscious_consumer/88/how-to-open-clamshell-packaging.html



A few points: A lot of folks talked about just using scissors the problem with that is you usually tend to cut up papers, warranties, even the item itself. And not everyone has a pair of industrial sized scissors to deal with it either lol.



The other is "well he used a knife at the end so what's the point"? The point is to use a knife at first is a HORRIBLE idea for safety reasons. The idea of the can opener is to open up a clean, straight edge so you can use a knife to just slice the rest open, quickly and neatly.


COMMENTS

-



crimsonxxtears
crimsonxxtears
02:45 Aug 31 2009

Smart very smart





 

22:31 Aug 27 2009
Times Read: 829


I want you to read this and then TELL me what this means, what's going on, who is this enemy. I don't care if you agree with me or like me or whatever but I really want an answer because I and at least 25 million others really don't understand it.



Obama’s Civil Defense Program Resembles Domestic Draft



Paul Joseph Watson

Prison Planet.com

Wednesday, November 12, 2008



A newly rediscovered 2006 audio clip has shed more light on Rahm Emanuel and Barack Obama’s plan for compulsory community service and a “national civilian security force”. In an interview with Ben Smith of the New York Daily News, Emanuel outlined the agenda for military-style training, essentially a domestic draft, aimed at preparing Americans for a chemical or biological terrorist attack.



Will the [population] pay as much attention to Emanuel’s stated agenda to implement a proxy domestic draft as they did to rumors of Bush bringing back conscription, or will the true scope of Obama’s “national civilian security force” continue to fly under the radar?



Asked by Smith about the universal service plan and whether people would have to live in military barracks, Emanuel laughed before responding, “We’re going to have universal civil defense training, somewhere between the ages of 18 to 25 you will do three months of training….but there can be nothing wrong with all Americans having a joint similar experience of what we call civil defense training or civil service in service of the country, in preparation, which will give people a sense of what it means to be an American.”



In response to the point that the program was significantly expanded in comparison to what the U.S. government already has in place, Emanuel responded, “Guess what – we have a lot more challenges so we are going to need a lot to do it.”



What challenges is Emanuel referring to? The same crisis foretold by Joe Biden, Colin Powell and others that we are “guaranteed” will unfold shortly after Obama takes office?



“It will be a common experience and we will be prepared, God forbid, God forbid that there is a chemical hit, another terrorist act or natural disaster becoming more frequent – there’ll be a body of citizens who are ready and capable and trained – that’s all you have to think about,” said Emanuel before smugly declaring, “We’re all here for you OK? It’s a circle of love.”



Asked if the training would be military style, with people wearing uniforms, Emanuel stated, “If you’re worried about are you going to have to do 50 jumping jacks the answer is yes,” adding that the service could be done through state national guard.



A jumping jack is a military term for an exercise otherwise known as a star jump. What on earth does Emanuel mean when he says Americans are going to be forced to perform military-style physical exercises and what does this have to do with civil defense or preparing for a terrorist attack? It sounds more like the state-mandated physical workouts described in Orwell’s 1984.



The video then features a clip from C-Span from August 2006 in which Emanuel is asked whether the program will be compulsory, to which he responds, “In a sense it’s required of everybody, 18 to 25, three months, and at some point at that point you do it.”



The use of the word “required” is noteworthy, because this exact terminology was removed from Obama’s change.gov website when controversy over the program arose last week.



The militarized nature of the program and its supposed intention sounds more like a draft-lite than the “community service” angle now being pitched on Obama’s website. It also bears similarities to the nationwide FEMA-run program training pastors and preachers to act as “pacifiers” in the event of martial law being declared after a terror attack or a natural disaster.





Watch the clip below.









Obama's speech:







I edited the article to ONLY take out text advertisments and to provide the main facts. You can read the full version at the site. There have been hundreds of similar articles written from every walk, every side. I just used this one because it had the largest number of facts in a single space that could easily find.


COMMENTS

-



Nightgame
Nightgame
22:44 Aug 27 2009

Honestly this is the first I've heard of this but I do not see it having any chance of being passed into law. It does sound distrubing though.





NocturnalMistress
NocturnalMistress
23:17 Aug 27 2009

You have got to be kidding me?



They are preparing for all of these "possible threats", yet we have a trained military for this VERY reason, but they want regular, every day civilians to be trained in a "military fashion"...



There is a reason why regular civilians are not recruited for such situations, not everyone can physically, mentally, or emotionally handle situations such as this. That is why everyone who is enlisted into the US Government is tested and evaluated. Are they flipping mad?? Even civilian contractors who work in military settings evaluate their employees... They really went bonkers, didn't they?!



I served in the US Army- I have done these trainings. I have experienced what it feels like to do this every day, and I am telling you not everyone can do them and/or cope in a setting like that.



They are recreating a 21st Century draft. There is no getting around it. Are we any better than, for instance, China? Where the men HAVE to serve in their army between a certain age. No matter what, it is a requirement?



This is the reason why we have the National Guard. They are state funded and are ready to come to the aid of any problems state or country wide. The police force IS the civilian force outside of the military.



It is like setting a gun in front of a child, one of these days he's going to become curious about it and he'll end up shooting himself.





This bothers me a lot because these men obviously never has been apart of any training with any branch of the U.S. Military and therefore can not grasp the concept of what the hell it takes to be able to undergo and complete and then be able to function in a settling such as that, under a stressful, dangerous, and life threatening situation.



Not everyone can do it, and thus making it a requirement so people can truly "understand" what it means to be an American, is just hogwash and bullshit, if you ask me.

Take away people's liberty and their choice, and you are going to create a very bad situation.



We have a strong military force, they have even put a limit on enlistees due to there not being enough space to train and hold our troops.



We do not need to have a "civilian draft" we have the police- our civilian force, we have the U.S. Military (Army, USMC, Air Force, Navy)- our defense, and we have the Nation Guard- those who are state funded and military trained.



And it's not called "jumping jacks" in the military... it is called "the side straddle hop.



>:|






ThothLestat
ThothLestat
01:26 Aug 28 2009

ha ha ha.... dude, I'm pretty sure Prison Planet is conspiracy theory CENTRAL. Take everything there with a GIANT-SIZED grain of salt.





Xzavier
Xzavier
02:53 Aug 28 2009

Oh yes they are lol BUT when you have a huge number of other sites, mainstream media and official White House reports/staff/speeches etc all saying pretty much the same thing then it isn't some conspiracy theorists fairy tale.



Like I said I had to choose one site to post and I picked them. Trust me they aren't my only source. Heck I might visit prisonplanet.com maybe once every other month.





ThothLestat
ThothLestat
14:40 Aug 28 2009

I'll check it out. It just seems a little far-fetched, like all that panicky chatter last year about the North American Union and the Amero. It's getting harder to separate the nuttiness from the real news lately.



I only listen to Batboy.

*tinfoil hat*





ToiletDuc
ToiletDuc
18:19 Aug 28 2009

I can't say I'm entirely opposed to the idea of a brief, limited mandatory civil service training.



However, the details of the program would have to be very carefully thought out and monitored. I don't believe I would trust our government to not twist such a concept into something resembling a draft or a form of control and further detracting from our rights.



Ideally, such a program could improve our education of the government and country, teach us to become better, more self-sufficient citizens, increase the effectiveness of a democratic government, and provide an increased level of security from threats outside of as well as within our country, and just as importantly from our government itself.



Like Marx's communism, I believe this is another idea that looks good on paper, but would be virtually impossible to implement without corruption outweighing any benefits.





Irony
Irony
03:47 Aug 31 2009

This doesn't sound so weird to me, but then you have to remember I am in Europe. I have friends from all over the place who have mandatory military service in their countries. That is just a few months as well.



I have had two conscientious objector friends that declined it and were instead found different things to do for that time. One ended up working with troubled kids and the other spent his time working in a prison.



The rest pretty much take it in their stride and don't really see it as much of a biggie. We used to have national service in the UK as well, and there is something of a movement to bring it back, if only for the discipline it instills.



I guess I don't see a problem with it as long as you are given the option to do an alternative to military training if it goes against your beliefs. I could not pick up a gun and point it at someone else, but I took advanced first aid training so that I could be of help in a domestic attack.



It might seem an odd thing for me to say, but my country was under attack from the IRA for a good percentage of my life, so it wasn't really that much of a stretch for us to think that way. I narrowly escaped a bomb in the 90's, and being trained in ways to cope can help you through some of that.



I am sorry if I am rambling, I have not long woke up. I have kind of a bad feeling that I am not responding in the way that people would like too, but I can see the point of it. I just hope if it goes through that it is implemented correctly for the american people or it will fall flat on its ass.





Xzavier
Xzavier
17:25 Aug 31 2009

I think you bring up some very good points. The problem is this isn't Europe and it's illegal for anyone to be forced to do any type of service, be it military, civil or otherwise except in punishment for a crime. All types of mandatory service (draft etc) blatantly goes against the Constitution, except MAYBE under imminent *invasion* (for example, individual states have the right to declare war in that case) and only when authorized by Congress and or the President with congressional approval within 48 hours (if I remember correctly) and it can't continue indefinitely.



We had a revolution based on freedom of choice and the pursuit of happiness and our laws make sure we don't have to deal with that again. It's the officials who have ignored the rule of law and just because a president says something doesn't make it legal, right or good.





Irony
Irony
02:36 Sep 01 2009

I am fairly ignorant of most of the constitution, but now I know why it is such a big deal for you guys. I would likely be pissed too if I saw something that my country was built on being dismissed. Thank you for helping me understand that:)





 

16:30 Aug 25 2009
Times Read: 837


In the International Year of Astronomy, the 400th anniversary of Galileo's Telescope let us remember the words of Dr. Guy Consolmagno



"Religion tells me who made the universe, science tells me how he did it."



Consolmagno is an American Jesuit and acclaimed astronomer who was trained at MIT and carries out research at the Vatican Observatory in the papal summer palace at Castelgandolfo in the south of Rome.


COMMENTS

-



voodoochile
voodoochile
17:28 Aug 25 2009

Hrmm, no wanting to flame the entry, so I will just say that the connection between who made it and how is akin to the missing link argument in creationism and evolution...interestingly odd.





 

17:49 Aug 19 2009
Times Read: 856


US Military mind control anyone?







United States Patent 6,470,214

O'Loughlin , et al. October 22, 2002



Method and device for implementing the radio frequency hearing effect



Abstract

A modulation process with a fully suppressed carrier and input preprocessor filtering to produce an encoded output; for amplitude modulation (AM) and audio speech preprocessor filtering, intelligible subjective sound is produced when the encoded signal is demodulated using the RF Hearing Effect. Suitable forms of carrier suppressed modulation include single sideband (SSB) and carrier suppressed amplitude modulation (CSAM), with both sidebands present.





Inventors: O'Loughlin; James P. (Placitas, NM), Loree; Diana L. (Albuquerque, NM)

Assignee: The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Air (

(Washington, DC)



Appl. No.: 08/766,687

Filed: December 13, 1996



Current U.S. Class: 607/56 ; 128/898

Current International Class: A61N 1/08 (20060101); H04B 007/00 ()

Field of Search: 607/55,56 600/559,23,586 128/897,898



References Cited [Referenced By]



U.S. Patent Documents





3563246 February 1971 Puharick

3629521 December 1971 Puharick

4835791 May 1989 Daoud



Primary Examiner: Schaetzle; Kennedy

Attorney, Agent or Firm: Skorich; James M. Callahan; Kenneth E.



Government Interests







STATEMENT OF GOVERNMENT INTEREST



The invention described herein may be manufactured and used by or for the Government for governmental purposes without the payment of any royalty thereon.



Claims







What is claimed is:



1. A method of encoding an input audio signal a(t) to produce a double sideband output signal having a .omega..sub.c carrier frequency, which when transmitted to the head of a receiving subject, will by the radio frequency hearing effect induce a thermal-acoustic signal in the bone/tissue material of the head that replicates the input audio signal and is conducted by the bone/tissue structure of the head to the inner ear where it is demodulated by the normal processes of the cochlea and converted to nerve signals which are sent to the brain, thereby enabling intelligible speech to be perceived by the brain as any other nerve signal from the cochlea, the method comprising: applying an input audio signal a(t) to an audio pre-distortion filter with an As(f) filter function to produce a first output signal a(t)As(f); adding a very low frequency bias A to the first output signal to produce a second output signal a(t)As(f)+A; applying the second output signal to a square root processor to produce a third output signal (a(t)As(f)+A).sup.1/2 ; applying the third output signal to a balanced modulator to produce a double sideband output signal (a(t)As(f)+A).sup.1/2 sin(.omega..sub.c t), where .omega..sub.c is the carrier frequency; and transmitting the double sideband output signal to the head of the receiving subject.



2. The method of claim 1, wherein the As(f) filter function step further comprises the step of de-emphasizing the high frequency content.



3. The method of claim 1, wherein the further step of suppressing one of the sidebands of the double sideband output signal is done resulting in a single sideband modulation transmission.



Description







BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION



This invention relates to the modulating of signals on carriers, which are transmitted and the signals intelligibly recovered, and more particularly, to the modulation of speech on a carrier and the intelligible recover of the speech by means of the Radio Frequency Hearing Effect.



The Radio Frequency ("RF") Hearing Effect was first noticed during World War II as a subjective "click" produced by a pulsed radar signal when the transmitted power is above a "threshold" level. Below the threshold level, the click cannot be heard.



The discovery of the Radio Frequency Hearing Effect suggested that a pulsed RF carrier could be encoded with an amplitude modulated ("AM") envelope. In one approach to pulsed carrier modulation, it was assumed that the "click" of the pulsed carrier was similar to a data sample and could be used to synthesize both simple and complex tones such as speech. Although pulsed carrier modulation can induce a subjective sensation for simple tones, it severely distorts the complex waveforms of speech, as has been confirmed experimentally.



The presence of this kind of distortion has prevented the click process for the encoding of intelligible speech. An example is provided by AM sampled data modulation.



Upon demodulation the perceived speech signal has some of the envelope characteristics of an audio signal. Consequently a message can be recognized as speech when a listener is preadvised that speech has been sent. However, if the listener does not know the content of the message, the audio signal is unintelligible.



The attempt to use the click process to encode speech has been based on the assumption that if simple tones can be encoded, speech can be encoded as well, but this is not so.



A simple tone can contain several distortions and still be perceived as a tone whereas the same degree of distortion applied to speech renders it unintelligible.



SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION



In accomplishing the foregoing and related object the invention uses a. modulation process with a fully suppressed carrier and pre-processor filtering of the input to produce an encoded output. Where amplitude modulation (AM) is employed and the pre-processor filtering is of audio speech input, intelligible subjective sound is produced when the encoded signal is demodulated by means of the RF Hearing Effect. Suitable forms of carrier suppressed modulation include single sideband (SSB) and carrier suppressed amplitude modulation (CSAM), with both sidebands present.



The invention further provides for analysis of the RF hearing phenomena based on an RF to acoustic transducer model. Analysis of the model suggests a new modulation process which permits the RF Hearing Effect to be used following the transmission of encoded speech.



In accordance with one aspect of the invention the preprocessing of an input speech signal takes place with a filter that de-emphasizes the high frequency content of the input speech signal. The de-emphasis can provide a signal reduction of about 40 dB (decibels) per decade. Further processing of the speech signal then takes place by adding a bias level and taking a root of the predistorted waveform. The resultant signal is used to modulated an RF carrier in the AM fully suppressed carrier mode, with single or double sidebands.



The modulated RF signal is demodulated by an RF to acoustic demodulator that produces an intelligible acoustic replication of the original input speech.



The RF Hearing Effect is explained and analyzed as a thermal to acoustic demodulating process. Energy absorption in a medium, such as the head, causes mechanical expansion and contraction, and thus an acoustic signal.



When the expansion and contraction take place in the head of an animal, the acoustic signal is passed by conduction to the inner ear where it is further processed as if it were an acoustic signal from the outer ear.



The RF to Acoustic Demodulator thus has characteristics which permit the conversion of the RF energy input to an acoustic output.



Accordingly, it is an object of the invention to provide a novel technique for the intelligible encoding of signals. A related object is to provide for the intelligible encoding of speech.



Another object of the invention is to make use of the Radio Frequency ("RF") Hearing Effect in the intelligible demodulation of encoded signals, including speech.



Still another object of the invention is to suitably encode a pulsed RF carrier with an amplitude modulated ("AM") envelope such that the modulation will be intelligibly demodulated by means of the RF Hearing Effect. A related object is to permit a message to be identified and understood as speech when a listener does not know beforehand that the message is speech.



Other aspects of the invention will become apparent after considering several illustrative embodiments, taken in conjunction with the drawings.



DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS



FIG. 1 is a block diagram model of RF to Acoustic Demodulation Process making use of the Radio Frequency ("RF") Hearing Effect;



FIG. 2 is a spherical demodulator and radiator having a specific acoustic impedance for demodulation using the RF Hearing Effect;



FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating the overall process and constituents of the invention; and



FIG. 4 is an illustrative circuit and wiring diagram for the components of FIG. 3.



DETAINED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT



With reference to the drawings, FIG. 1 illustrates the RF to acoustic demodulation process of the invention. Ordinarily and acoustic signal A reaches the outer ear E of the head H and traverses first to the inner ear I and then to the acoustic receptors of the brain B. A modulated RF signal, however, enters a demodulator D, which is illustratively provided by the mass M of the brain, and is approximated, as shown in FIG. 2, by a sphere S of radius r in the head H. The radius r of the sphere S is about 7 cm to make the sphere S equivalent to about the volume of the brain B. It will be appreciated that where the demodulator D, which can be an external component, is not employed with the acoustic receptors of the brain B, it can have other forms.



The sphere S, or its equivalent ellipsoid or similar solid, absorbs RF power which causes an increase in temperature that in turn causes an expansion and contraction which results in an acoustic wave. As a first approximation, it is assumed that the RF power is absorbed uniformly in the brain. Where the demodulator D is external to the brain B, the medium and/or RF carrier frequency can be selected to assure sufficiently uniform absorption.



For the modulated RF signal of FIG. 1, the power absorbed in the sphere S is proportional to the power waveform of the modulated RF signal. The absorption rate is characterized quantitatively in terms of the SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) in the units of absorbed watts per kilogram per incident watt per square centimeter.



The temperature of the sphere S is taken as following the integrated heat input from the power waveform, i.e. the process is approximated as being adiabatic, at least for short term intervals on the order of a few minutes.



The radial expansion of the sphere follows temperature and is converted to sound pressure, p(t), determined by the radial velocity (U.sub.r) multiplied by the real part of the specific acoustic impedance (Z.sub.s) of the sphere, as indicated in equation (1), below.



Where: .rho..sub.o =density, 1000 kg/m.sup.3 for water c=speed of sound, 1560 m/s, in water @ 37.degree. C. k=wave number, 2.pi./wavelength r=sphere radius, in meters (m) f=audio frequency f.sub.c =lower cutoff break frequency,=c/(2 .pi.r) j=the 90 degree phase-shift operator.



The specific acoustic impedance for a sphere of 7 cm radius, on the order of the size of the brain, has a lower cut-off break frequency of about 3,547 Hertz (Hz) for the parameters given for equation (1). The essential frequency range of speech is about 300 to 3000 Hz, i.e., below the cut-off frequency. It is therefore the Real part (R.sub.c) of Z.sub.s times the radial particle velocity (U.sub.r) which determines the sound pressure, p(t). The real part of Z.sub.s is given by equation (1a), below:



In the speech spectrum, which is below the brain cut-off frequency, the sphere S is an acoustic filter which "rolls off", i.e. decreases in amplitude at -40 dB per decade with decreasing frequency. In addition to any other demodulation processes to be analyzed below, the filter characteristics of the sphere will modify the acoustic signal with a 40 dB per decade slope in favor of the high frequencies.



Results for an AM Modulated Single Tone



An RF carrier with amplitude A.sub.c at frequency .omega..sub.c is AM modulated 100 percent with a single tone audio signal at frequency .omega..sub.a. The voltage (time) equation of this modulated signal is given by equation (2), below:



The power signal is V(t).sup.2 as given by equation (3), below:



To find the energy absorbed in the sphere, the time integral of equation (3) is taken times the absorption coefficient, K. The result is divided by the specific heat, SH, to obtain the temperature of the sphere and then multiplied by the volume expansion coefficient, Mv to obtain the change in volume. The change in volume is related to the change in radius by equation (4), below:



To obtain the amplitude of the radius change, there is multiplication by the radius and division by three. The rms radial surface velocity, U.sub.r is determined by multiplying the time derivative by r and dividing by 2.sup.1/2. The result, U.sub.r, is proportional to the power function, P(t) in equation (5), below.



The acoustic pressure, p(t), is given in equation (6), below, as the result of multiplying equation (5) by the Real part of the specific acoustic impedance, R.sub.e (1).



The SPL (Sound Pressure Level), in acoustic dB, is approximated as 20 log[p(t)/2E-5]. The standard acoustic reference level of 2E-5 Newtons per square meter is based on a signal in air; however, the head has a water-like consistency. Therefore, the subjective level in acoustic dB is only approximate, but sufficient for first order accuracy.



In a single tone case the incident RF power, P(t), from equation (3) has two terms as shown in equation (7), below, which are in the hearing range.



This is converted to the acoustic pressure wave, p(t), by multiplying by the specific acoustic impedance calculated at the two frequencies. Therefore, the resulting pressure wave as indicated in equation (8), below, becomes



The result is an audio frequency and a second harmonic at about 1/4 amplitude. Thus using an RF carrier, AM modulated by a single tone, the pressure wave audio signal will consist of the audio tone and a second harmonic at about -6 dB, if the specific acoustic impedances at the two frequencies are the same. However, from equation (1) the break frequency of a model 7 cm sphere is 3.547 Hz. Most of the speech spectrum is below this frequency therefore the specific acoustic impedance is reactive and the real component is given by equation (8a), below:



Below the cutoff frequency the real part of the impedance varies as the square of the frequency or gives a boost of 40 dB per decade. Therefore, if the input modulation signal is 1 kHz, the second harmonic will have a boost of about 4 time in amplitude, or 12 dB, due to the variation of the real part of the specific acoustic impedance with frequency. So the second harmonic pressure term in equation (8) is actually four times the power or 6 dB higher than the fundamental term. If the second harmonic falls above the cutoff frequency then the boost begins to fall back to 0 dB. However, for most of the speech spectrum there is a sever distortion and strong boost of the high frequency distortion components.



Results for Two Tone AM Modulation Analysis



Because of the distortion attending single tone modulation, predistortion of the modulation could be attempted such that the resulting demodulated pressure wave will not contain harmonic distortion. This will not work, however, because of the non-linear cross-products of two-tone modulation are quite different from single tone modulation as shown below.



Nevertheless, two-tone modulation distortion provides an insight for the design of a corrective process for a complex modulation signal such as speech. The nature of the distortion is defined in terms of relative amplitudes and frequencies.



Equation (8a) is that of an AM modulated carrier for the two-tone case where .omega..sub.a1 and .omega..sub.a2 are of equal amplitude and together modulate the carrier to a maximum peak value of 100 percent. The total modulated RF signal is given by equation (8b), below:



The square of (8b) is the power signal, which has the same form as the particle velocity, U.sub.r (t), of equation (9), below.



From the square of (8b) the following frequencies and relative amplitudes are obtained for the particle velocity wave, U.sub.r (t), which are in the audio range;



If the frequencies in equation (9) are below the cut-off frequency, the impedance boost correction will result in a pressure wave with relative amplitudes given in equation (9a), below:



p(t)=C'[sin(.omega..sub.a1 t)+b.sup.2 sin(.omega..sub.a2 t)+(1-b.sup.2)/4 cos((.omega..sub.a1 -.omega..sub.a2)t)+(1+b.sup.2)/4 cos((.omega..sub.a1 +.omega..sub.a2)t)-1/2 cos(2.omega..sub.a1)t)-b.sup.2 /2 cos(2.omega..sub.a2 t) (9a)



where: b=.omega..sub.a2 /.omega..sub.a1 and .omega..sub.a2 >.omega..sub.a1.



Equation (9a) contains a correction factor, b, for the specific acoustic impedance variation with frequency. The first two terms of (9a) are the two tones: of the input modulation with the relative amplitudes modified by the impedance correction factor. The other terms are the distortion cross products which are quite different from the single line distortion case. In addition to the second harmonics, there are sum and difference frequencies. From this two-tone analysis it is obvious that more complex multiple tone modulations, such as speech, will be severely distorted with even more complicated cross-product and sum and difference components. This is not unexpected since the process which creates the distortion is nonlinear. This leads to the conclusion that a simple passive predistortion filter will not work on a speech signal modulated on an RF carrier by a convention AM process, because the distortion is a function of the signal by a nonlinear process.



However, the serious distortion problem can be overcome by means of the invention which exploits the characteristics of a different type of RF modulation process in addition to special signal processing.



AM Modulation with Fully Suppressed Carrier for the Intelligible Encoding of Speech by the Invention for Compatibility with the RF Hearing Phenomena



The equation for AM modulation with a fully suppressed carrier is given by equation (10), below:



This modulation is commonly accomplished in hardware by means of a circuit known as a balanced modulator, as disclosed, for example in "Radio Engineering", Frederick E. Terman, p.481-3, McGraw-Hill, 1947.



The power signal has the same form as the particle velocity signal which is obtained from the square of equation (10) as shown in equation (11), below:



From inspection of equations (10) and (11) it is seen that, if the input audio signal, a(t), is pre-processed by taking the square root and then modulating the carrier, the audio term in the particle velocity equation will be an exact, undistorted, replication of the input audio signal. Since the audio signal from a microphone is bipolar, it must be modified by adding a very low frequency (essential d.c.) bias term, A, such that the resultant sum, [a(t)+A]>0.0, is always positive. This is necessary in order to insure a real square root. The use of a custom digital speech processor implements the addition of the term A, i.e. as shown in equation (10*), below:



The pressure wave is given by equation (11*), below:



When the second term of the pressure wave of equation (11*) is processed through the specific acoustic impedance it will result in the replication of the input audio signal but will be modified by the filter characteristics of the Real part of the specific acoustic impedance, R.sub.e {Z.sub.s (f)}, as given in equation (8a). The first term of equation (11*) is the d.c. bias, which is added to obtain a real square root; it will not be audible or cause distortion. The third and fourth terms of (11*) are a.c. terms at twice the carrier frequency and therefore will not distort or interfere with the audio range signal, a(t).



Since the filter characteristic of equation (7) is a linear process in amplitude, the audio input can be predistorted before the modulation is applied to the carrier and then the pressure or wound wave audio signal, which is the result of the velocity wave times the impedance function, R.sub.e {Z.sub.s (f)}, will be the true replication of the original input audio signal.



A diagram illustrating the overall system 30 and process of the invention is shown in FIG. 3. Then input signal a(t) is applied to an Audio Predistortion Filter 31 with a filter function As(f) to produce a signal a(t)As(f), which is applied to a Square Root Processor 32, providing an output=(a(t)As(f)+A).sup.1/2, which goes to a balanced modulator 33. The modulation process known as suppressed carrier, produces a double sideband output=(a(t)As(f)+A).sup.1/2 sin(.omega..sub.c t), where .omega..sub.c is the carrier frequency. If one of the sidebands and the carrier are suppressed (not shown) the result is single sideband (SSB) modulation and will function in the same manner discussed above for the purposes of implementing the invention. However, the AM double sideband suppressed carrier as described is more easily implemented.



The output of the balanced modulator is applied to a spherical demodulator 34, which recovers the input signal a(t) that is applied to the inner ear 35 and then to the acoustic receptors in the brain 36.



The various components 31-33 of FIG. 3 are easily implemented as shown, for example by the corresponding components 41-42 in FIG. 4, where the Filter 41 can take the form of a low pass filter, such as a constant-K filter formed by series inductor L and a shunt capacitor C. Other low-pass filters are shown, for example, in the ITT Federal Handbook, 4th Ed., 1949. As a result the filter output is AS(f) a 1/f.sup.2. The Root Processor 42 can be implemented by any square-law device, such as the diode D biased by a battery B and in series with a large impedance (resistance) R, so that the voltage developed across the diode D is proportional to the square root of the input voltage a(t)As(f). The balanced modulator 43, as discussed in Terman, op.cit., has symmetrical diodes A1 and A2 with the modulating voltage M applied in opposite phase to the diodes A1 and A2 through an input transformer T1, with the carrier, O, applied commonly to the diodes in the same phase, while the modulating signal is applied to the diodes in opposite phase so that the carrier cancels in the primary of the output transformer T2 and the secondary output is the desired double side band output.



Finally the Spherical Demodulator 45 is the brain as discussed above, or an equivalent mass that provides uniform expansion and contraction due to thermal effects of R.F energy.



The invention provides a new and useful encoding for speech on an RF carrier such that the speech will be intelligible to a human subject by means of the RF hearing demodulation phenomena. Features of the invention include the use of AM fully suppressed carrier modulation, the preprocessing of an input speech signal be a compensation filter to de-emphasize the high frequency content by 40 dB per decade and the further processing of the audio signal by adding a bias terms to permit the taking of the square root of the signal before the AM suppressed carrier modulation process.



The invention may also be implemented using the same audio signal processing and Single Sideband (SSB) modulation in place of AM suppressed carrier modulation. The same signal processing may also be used on Conventional AM modulation containing both sideband and the carrier; however, there is a serious disadvantage. The carrier is always present with AM modulation, even when there is no signal. The carrier power does not contain any information but contributes substantially to the heating of the thermalacoustic demodulator, i.e. the brain, which is undesirable. The degree of this extraneous heating is more than twice the heating caused by the signal or information power in the RF signal. Therefore conventional AM modulation is an inefficient and poor choice compared to the double side-band suppressed carrier and the SSB types of transmissions.



The invention further may be implemented using various degrees of speech compression commonly used with all types of AM modulation. Speech compression is implemented by raising the level of the low amplitude portions of the speech waveform and limiting or compressing the high peak amplitudes of the speech waveform. Speech compression increases the average power content of the waveform and thus loudness. Speech compression introduces some distortion, so that a balance must be made between the increase in distortion and the increase in loudness to obtain the optimum result.



Another implementation is by digital signal processing of the input signal through to the modulation of the RF carrier.


COMMENTS

-



atyourwindow
atyourwindow
07:16 Aug 20 2009

o.o shhhhhh!





Irony
Irony
10:49 Aug 21 2009

Ohh the pranks you could pull with something like that... Probably a very good idea that I don't work for the US government. I would be very tempted to abuse it.





 

15:25 Aug 13 2009
Times Read: 890


Newfound Planet Orbits Backward



SPACE.com Jeanna Bryner And Robert Roy Britt



Wed Aug 12, 11:21 am ET

Updated 11:05 a.m. ET



Planets orbit stars in the same direction that the stars rotate. They all do. Except one.



A newfound planet orbits the wrong way, backward compared to the rotation of its host star. Its discoverers think a near-collision may have created the retrograde orbit, as it is called.



The star and its planet, WASP-17, are about 1,000 light-years away. The setup was found by the UK's Wide Area Search for Planets (WASP) project in collaboration with Geneva Observatory. The discovery was announced today but has not yet been published in a journal.



"I would have to say this is one of the strangest planets we know about," said Sara Seager, an astrophysicist at MIT who was not involved in the discovery.



What's going on



A star forms when a cloud of gas and dust collapses. Whatever movement the cloud had becomes intensified as it condenses, determining the rotational direction of the star. How planets form is less certain. They are, however, known to develop out of the leftover, typically disk-shaped mass of gas and dust that swirls around a newborn star, so whatever direction that material is moving, which is the direction of the star's rotation, becomes the direction of the planet's orbit.



WASP-17 likely had a close encounter with a larger planet, and the gravitational interaction acted like a slingshot to put WASP-17 on its odd course, the astronomers figure.



"I think it's extremely exciting. It's fascinating that we can study orbits of planets so far away," Seager told SPACE.com. "There's always theory, but there's nothing like an observation to really prove it."



Cosmic collisions are not uncommon. Earth's moon was made when our planet collided with a Mars-sized object, astronomers think. And earlier this week NASA's Spitzer Space Telescope found evidence of two planets colliding around a distant, young star. Some moons in our solar system are on retrograde orbits, perhaps at least in some cases because they were flying through space alone and then captured; that's thought to be the case with Neptune's large moon Triton.



The find was made by graduate students David Anderson at Keele University and Amaury Triaud of the Geneva Observatory.



Bloated world



WASP-17 is about half the mass of Jupiter but bloated to twice its size. "This planet is only as dense as expanded polystyrene, 70 times less dense than the planet we're standing on," said professor Coel Hellier of Keele University.



The bloated planet can be explained by a highly elliptical orbit, which brings it close to the star and then far away. Like exaggerated tides on Earth, the tidal effects on WASP-17 heat and stretch the planet, the researchers suggest.



The tides are not a daily affair, however. "Instead it's creating a huge amount of friction on the inside of the planet and generating a lot of energy, which might be making the planet big and puffy," Seager said.



WASP-17 is the 17th extrasolar planet found by the WASP project, which monitors hundreds of thousands of stars, watching for small dips in their light when a planet transits in front of them. NASA's Kepler space observatory is using the same technique to search for Earth-like worlds.



Source: http://news.yahoo.com/s/space/20090812/sc_space/newfoundplanetorbitsbackward


COMMENTS

-



ToiletDuc
ToiletDuc
02:37 Aug 14 2009

I guess there's more to all those styrofoam ball solar systems made by grade schoolers than we ever would have thought.





CryingDutchess
CryingDutchess
22:36 Aug 16 2009

I read about this. I would be WASP-17. Not to be a rebel, but because I got puffed up full of hot air, and lost my shit. As usual, my temper would get the best of me and I would be the tail of jokes for orbits to come.





 

07:49 Aug 11 2009
Times Read: 918


I'm curious to know who here thinks that programmes designed to create the "perfect" or at least close to perfect society are worth it and should be implemented.



Programmes such as selective breeding, genetically engineered children, weeding out "sub-standard" embryos so only the best ones develop, euthanasia for the chronically ill or elderly, forced sterilization for criminals or those with hereditary mental/physical handicaps, reorganized social class systems, placement testing to see who may qualify for the best jobs and/or schools, reproductive limits based on the parent(s) education and economic situation, forced marriages for those who have children, licenses for getting pregnant, preferential healthcare, loans/financing based upon a person status in society and their predetermined potential, etc.



I personally I do think some of those may be beneficial on a limited basis. Our civilisation is facing many, many problems that will affect all of us in some way and we have to come up with ideas to insure we continue to advance and can continue to live on Earth in relative comfort without fully draining Earth's resources and dumping us back into the stone age. A more stable and effective society may also help keep the number and scope of warfare down and increase the speed by which cures for diseases can be found as well as new technologies for communication, exploration and so forth.



Just some thoughts.


COMMENTS

-



XD
XD
07:54 Aug 11 2009

Is it just me or is it the most opposition comes from the hillbillies that would be the first ones to go?





Xzavier
Xzavier
08:08 Aug 11 2009

To a degree yes lol. From a strictly "we are equal in all ways" stand point pretty much every option up there is highly unethical BUT ethics are nothing more than the collective conscience of a society at that point in time. They change drastically every 30 years or so.



Looking out at the big picture we see that something must be done. After the first generation or so, as we transfer from the way we are now to then, opposition would decline markedly and in time it would be common place..a rather short time actually.



I don't think people should be lined up and killed or locked away in some hell hole but, it would be where the less desirable populations simply live out their lives, don't reproduce and then all that's left is the foundation of a more perfect society.



I know things like this can lead us down a very terrible path but not asking hard questions and not coming up with ever harder solutions will place us on the road of near total destruction.





XD
XD
10:56 Aug 11 2009

The less desirable but ultimately best solution would be to stop reproducing, or at least stongly limit it and bring the world back to a natural equilibrium?





crimsonxxtears
crimsonxxtears
15:15 Aug 11 2009

Well sweetie if we did weed out all the bad things that are in people I think we would be doing what the Spartans did. Any weird anomaly and the tossed the new born over the cliff. It was said they were known as the perfect race. As far as Ancient Greece goes they were.

In many ways I agree with that but I dont agree with the murder of the week, I say send them off to build a race of their own. Because whose to say they wont give birth to more strong children.

When it comes down to forced marriages would that be because of how perfect the couple is or because they would help that race with more strong babies? Arranged marriages are still a thing of the past as are dowries. But if we were ever to create the "Perfect Race" it would come back

It may be beneficial to us but in the end it would fall as the Greeks did.





Xzavier
Xzavier
17:59 Aug 11 2009

In general under these options no one would be killed (unless for punishment of some crime). The only things that would be terminated would be substandard embryos.



The reason for forced marriages would be for the stability of the child. In most cases of "bastard" birth the reasons for the parents to not marry are selfish and have nothing to do with any substantial reason. Children raised with only one parent are much more likely to fall behind, engage in poor behaviour etc. There would be provisions to where should a parent be unfit for raising the child they wouldn't be forced to marry. For the most part though parents would have to marry. It would also cut down on the number of multiple-father issues, you know one woman having sex with multiple partners and then giving birth to one illegitimate child after another.



While the Greeks did end up falling it really had nothing to do with their breeding practices but problems maintaining certain social orders and simply being defeated militarily which has little to do with anything but who had the better army and tactics.



Unlike with the Greeks (to a lesser degree), the Nazis and other groups the goal here wouldn't be to produce the perfect race but the perfect (or as close to perfect) society. The world would still have dozens of races and thousands of cultures/languages but those who made them up would have better genetics, education, social and personal responsibilities and potential.





ToiletDuc
ToiletDuc
03:18 Aug 13 2009

While I can see some things as plausible to an extent, I'm very wary of moving anywhere in the direction of Huxley's "Brave New World."





LadyxDarkxRayne
LadyxDarkxRayne
17:50 Aug 17 2009

Well my view on a few of these that you have listed ...



Licenses to get pregnant, I think should be required with the amount of people that have kids and cant take care of them and leave them to the tax payers to pay for I think it shouild be that way. And the amount of kids that are in foster care due to being abused neglected and then poof the mother goes and has another kid and another kid and the kids continue to get plpaced in foster homes.....Touchy subject with me yes.



On the note of forced marriages and forced marriages for those that have children.....I have never been a fan of marriage that is public knowledge, but saying that people should be forced to be married because they have children, no freakin way... My parents tried that with me when I had my son. And as I told them then and I will say it again, what does being married have to do with raising a child.So when the marriage fails and we know the percentage is it better tyo then have to drag a child thru a nasty divorce ... I think not.





 

13:05 Aug 02 2009
Times Read: 960


Trust me, this is worth the read.



Health care is something we all have to deal with be it from a simple cold or a life threatening illness. One of the main hindrances to getting full health care is money and in today's economy having enough money to pay for expensive premiums is getting harder and harder.



Of course today the topic is universal health care. There are 3 types of universal health care, 1) fully funded government controlled health care 2) a mix of government and private health care

3) comprehensive universal health care based on everyone's ability to afford it.



I strongly oppose option one with every fibre of my being for many reasons the biggest of which is government's propensity for running itself like other massive, faceless and corrupt corporations. Option three would be the best except it's just not possible. No matter what we can't have perfect health care for $20 a year, get real folks. So let's look at some things for option two.



To keep things somewhat simple I really just want to focus on the private side of health care and the medical industry in general.



It's no secret that I've been part of the medical community for years and was on my way to being a board certified neurosurgeon. It's also no secret that I have worked for both the federal government and the pharmaceutical industry so I have a bit of a "unique" position to look at things from multiple sides and since I also have a serious medical condition, and now broke, I really want the best thing not just the thing that will give me job security and pad the pockets of some CEO.



The medical industry is severely corrupt and wrought with "conflicts of interest". It has also been in bed with the federal government for decades. So how are we supposed to know who to trust? The insurance companies who say they need less regulation and more income or the government who wants to take over the health care needs of 300 million tax paying citisens out of "compassion"?

In the purest scientific method we should trust the numbers.



One of my doctors costs $135 for a regular visit and it costs that much because he is bound by the costs of his insurance. I can't simply go to the office to get the same prescription I've been using for a year because of government supported regulations in support of insurance companies. An MRI can cost upward of $4,000 not because the equipment costs so much but because of various overheads related to insurance.



Now let's break some things down here. The average MRI machine costs $3 million and the avg. MRI procedure costs $2,700 which means that with 1,100 or so patients the machine is paid for. Well obviously things don't work like that when most MRI facilities preform 2,500 MRIs a year and, when in the US, there are 26 million MRI's given yearly yet prices remain high.



So what's the problem? Well in reality the cost of an MRI (preformed in a dedicated facility, not a general hospital which does cost legitimately more) is around $700. Of course when you get your bill you see much bigger numbers. In most cases if you have insurance you'll see deep discounts and if you're self-pay you will see major cuts as well....IF you pay within a specific period of time or if you ask. But here is the kicker, the insurance companies require medical facilities to charge the higher prices in order for the ins. company to have them in their networks. What that does is artificially inflate the price and if you're lucky enough to not have ins. (like me) even though you get billed a discounted amount the difference in the discount and "retail" costs get tacked onto the overall cost of the MRI. Which is why you have such a wide range in prices from $500 to $4,000 and even more.



Of course everyone asks the question "why does it cost so much?" and we all know the answer....profit. There is nothing wrong with making a profit however how you get that profit and how much profit you make compared to the need of your service is up for debate. If you remember my entry on Walmart back in May 2009 I told you that Walmart made a $12 billion profit last year at a 3.5% profit margin. I don't think anyone would call 3.5% high especially when some stores make a 50% profit on an item for "sale" at 66%.



If Walmart has a profit margin of 3.5% then surely the insurance companies that help save the lives of millions have an even lower or at least comparable rate, right? Nope :) In fact 20% of each dollar you spend goes toward operating expenses and profits according to the former VP of CIGNA, Wendell Potter.



You see there is a bit of "circular pricing" going on. Insurance costs so much because of high medical prices which are set by, in large part, the insurance companies. Now, insurance companies aren't the only bad guys and in some cases they're actually helping the situation. Another year round favourite is the drug companies.



It can cost up to $1 billion for the development of ONE drug. You see drug development can take 10 years or more, involve the work of thousands of people and is heavily regulated by the government which also charges millions in fees. I'm sure that if it plainly cost $1 billion for a drug that only 5% of the population takes we might not frown at paying a decent amount of cash for the medication. But here is the kicker, the biggest reasons why drugs cost so much is because of our old pals the insurance companies and the federal government.



You see prices are so high because drug companies only have control over the drug patent for 10-15 years from the date drug development began. Since it can take 8-10 years for a drug to become approved (oh, I forgot to mention that most drugs have been fully developed within a few years, it's all the government red-tape that adds on the big years) a drug company may only have 1-2 years to turn a profit on their billion dollar investment. After the patent runs out the drug can then get into the hands of the generics companies (many of whom are owned by the brand name company).



After all that the solution seems easy right? We need government regulation to keep all of this from happening! Well, not exactly.



This lovely Obama inspired health care fiasco we're thinking about entering into has a few flaws.



The AMA, Eli Lilly and Blue Cross Blue Shield has spent $10.2 million lobbying Congress to make sure the bill is just right which includes keeping drugs from going generic for 12 years. That's an additional 12 years of high priced medication. And, since the pricing of medication works similarly to the pricing of medical procedures that's another 12 years of added income for the insurance companies who mainly dictate the cost of medication by the way and not the drug companies.



~When those in need have nothing to pay Washington, Washington has nothing to give.~



Now, when AETNA (an insurance company) recently purged 8 million policy holders (that's dumped 8 million people from their plans) the company's stock went up. That's right, when the publicly traded company dropped 8 million folks from their plans their stock went up. Who are the share holders? Mostly the American public.



~There is something very wrong in society when kicking 8 million people from health insurance gets rewarded.~



You see the real problem is made up of three parts the companies, the government and the consumer. Let me break that down a bit further.



The problem is the consumer, which means folks who buy things.

The problem is the government which is elected by the consumer.

The problem is the companies which is bought and traded by the consumer.

The problem is the public.



Of course it isn't entirely directly YOUR fault so much as it isn't entirely the fault of the government or the medical/insurance industries but when you place it all together you start to see the real picture. Greed is a powerful force and it's something we all have. Greed is why Walmart is so popular and greed is why 45 million or so Americans are without health insurance, keeping many of them from any health care at all.



I don't have the answer but I hope that buy presenting the big picture somehow we can find it. Obama is not going to help you, in fact he is going to do everything he can to hurt you the same for profit driven industries. In general, of course, there isn't some grand conspiracy to hurt people and many involved genuinely think they are helping but when you break it down in plain English reality becomes clear.



We cannot look to government for answers we must look to ourselves and out of the minds of all of us we can guide those with power to apply our answers. In full the problems and solutions are complicated but what drives them is simple.



--Xzavier


COMMENTS

-



LadyxDarkxRayne
LadyxDarkxRayne
16:22 Aug 09 2009

I couldnt agree more, for those of us that have had to be on specific prescriptions and they cost around 350 a month, it gets to be to the point of which is more important havinga roof over your head, or gettingh the prescriptions that you need in order not to get sick, and if you opt to go with out the meds you then have the issues of getting sick and endingh up in the hospital anyways just for them to take your 75.00 to walk in the door make you wait for 6 hours runs tests on your that are not needede just for them to say we dont know whats wrong go back to your primary doctor, even though it was the primary dr that sent you to the ER to begin with, xo then just top cover their asses the er prescibes you a "cure all" antiobotic that you then find out is used to treat patients that have been exposed to anthrax and then no one can figure out why it is that you are so sick that you cant even get out of bed for days.... so its just a vicious circle..... - end rant





 

03:39 Aug 02 2009
Times Read: 965


This makes me sick!



"Gunman kills 3, injures 11 at club for gay youths in Tel Aviv"



By IAN DEITCH, Associated Press Writer Ian Deitch, Associated Press Writer – 1 hr 15 mins ago

JERUSALEM – Israeli police say a gunman entered a youth club for gay teens in central Tel Aviv on Saturday night and sprayed the interior with automatic rifle fire, killing three people and injuring 11.



Police spokesman Micky Rosenfeld said it was "most likely a criminal attack and not a terror attack." Tel Aviv has been a target for Palestinian militants in the past.



He said the gunman burst into the basement of the Tel Aviv Gay and Lesbian Association and opened fire on a support group for gay teenagers.



Police are searching the area for the gunman, who fled the scene, he said. Roadblocks were set up.



Rescue services said six of the wounded were badly hurt.



"This was a hate crime, a premeditated attack," witness Yaniv Weisman told Channel 10 TV. He said Cafe Noir, the basement club, was popular with youth.



"Those hurt were very young," he said.



Openly gay Knesset lawmaker Nitzan Horowitz said it was "without a doubt the biggest ever attack on the Israeli gay community, we are all in shock."



Witnesses told Israeli media that the gunman was dressed all in black, and described the scene as a "bloodbath."



http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090802/ap_on_re_mi_ea/ml_israel_tel_aviv_shooting


COMMENTS

-



crimsonxxtears
crimsonxxtears
21:47 Aug 02 2009

OMG that was one sick bastard. People can be cruel but this one was one heartless soulless bastard. Makes me think Hitlers been reborn.








COMPANY
REQUEST HELP
CONTACT US
SITEMAP
REPORT A BUG
UPDATES
LEGAL
TERMS OF SERVICE
PRIVACY POLICY
DMCA POLICY
REAL VAMPIRES LOVE VAMPIRE RAVE
© 2004 - 2024 Vampire Rave
All Rights Reserved.
Vampire Rave is a member of 
Page generated in 0.1133 seconds.
X
Username:

Password:
I agree to Vampire Rave's Privacy Policy.
I agree to Vampire Rave's Terms of Service.
I agree to Vampire Rave's DMCA Policy.
I agree to Vampire Rave's use of Cookies.
•  SIGN UP •  GET PASSWORD •  GET USERNAME  •
X